Say What You Need to Say

Enlighten me here... Call me selfish and inconsiderate but I am seriously annoyed hearing about it.

Scenario

"Child A in his/her adult mind set ask a second generation family member who is Child B if they can ASK (like a piece of candy type asking) a little portion of Child B's parents land because child A is planning to sell his/her parents property [house and lot]. For what reason, it was not divulge... although Child B's family already has some innuendo on the matter... In lieu with Child A's scheme, Child A is just VERY concern of his/her parents who is going to be homeless after the whole ordeal. Now the question is, why does child B's family be shouldering child A's parents predicament after child A's decision? Was it Child B's choice to make Child A's parents alone and estranged? For that matter whatever brought Child A's arbitration in selling his/her parents property, maybe valid or not ... why does Child B's family suffer and be the solution/fixer? Was it Child B's accord to strip Child A's parents from their home?"

What the heck happen to the world??? Where is the logic???

Someone has to help me fathom the point here... maybe i can understand better.

{Just my two cents and thought on this matter, if desperately needed to sell Child A's parents property, why can't the family of child A spare a portion of child A's parents land for them to live in. Why take/beg/ask someone elses property?}

Don't you think the whole scenario is weird? I am literally lost and confused...*inhale-exhale*

[gotta run to the gym now]